Caveat verdict

academic-citation-manager

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill appears to be a legitimate academic citation manager with clear functionality and no evidence of malicious behavior.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

73
security
90
transparency
90
maintenance

Permission integrity

Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries

file_read

Findings (1)

Pattern match high

Uses exec() — may execute shell commands

PROJECT_COMPLETION_SUMMARY.md · code · exec(

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

file_readnetwork_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API