Caveat verdict
academic-literature-review-assistant
88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.
The skill is designed to assist users in analyzing academic papers and converting them into structured literature review materials. It does not exhibit any malicious or risky behavior.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
100
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance
No red flags detected in static analysis.
Checked: 115 threat patterns · AST capability extraction · cross-zone compound shapes · permission integrity.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Was this verdict right?
Thanks — recorded.