ClawAudit verdict
academic-paper-analysis
88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose
The skill is designed to analyze academic papers in-depth, providing structured explanations of research design, methods, and results. It does not exhibit any malicious or risky behavior.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
100
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance
No red flags detected in static analysis.
Checked: 115 threat patterns · AST capability extraction · cross-zone compound shapes · permission integrity.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Was this verdict right?
Thanks — recorded.