Caveat verdict

academic-paper-reviewer

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill provides a legitimate academic paper review system with clear documentation and no evidence of malicious behavior.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

30
security
90
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (4)

Pattern match critical

Possible hardcoded credential

shared/cross_model_verification.md · code · API_KEY="sk-your-key-here

Pattern match high

Prompt injection — tries to override agent instructions

agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md · prose · downgraded · ignore prior instructions

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness

shared/ground_truth_isolation_pattern.md · prose · downgraded · silently

Pattern match medium

Accesses shell history/config

shared/cross_model_verification.md · prose · downgraded · ~/.zshrc

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API