ClawAudit verdict

aegisclaw

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill manages Binance assets and requires sensitive environment variables. While it seems to follow best practices for secure use, the requirement for sensitive credentials makes it risky if not properly handled.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

15
security
90
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (6)

Pattern match critical

Pipe-to-shell pattern (curl | sh) — supply chain attack vector

README.md · code · curl -fsSL https://cdn.anthropic.com/install.sh | sh

Pattern match critical

Pipe to sh — executes piped content as shell commands

README.md · code · | sh

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

install.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match medium

subprocess with shell=True — command injection vector

install.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True

Pattern match low

Python os.getenv — reads environment variable

config.py · prose · downgraded · os.getenv(

Pattern match low

Python shutil file operation — copies/moves/deletes files

install.py · prose · downgraded · shutil.copy(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class A/D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API