Caveat verdict

skill-review

ant-skill-review

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Security scanner for Claude Code skills using deterministic static analysis and LLM review; the external calls are to npm/PyPI registries for dependency checking, which matches the stated purpose.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

75
security
60
transparency
80
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime โ€” transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (1)

Pattern match high

Pipe to sh โ€” executes piped content as shell commands

SKILL.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท |sh

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class A). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API