Caveat verdict

architecture-consistency-guardian

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Procedural skill enforcing global-first code change discipline across a codebase; purely instructional workflow with no external calls, credential access, or code execution sinks — executionSinkDetected likely from documented command examples.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

60
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

Pipe to python — executes piped content as Python code

scripts/summarize_impacts.py · prose · downgraded · | python3

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness

references/risk_patterns.md · prose · downgraded · silently

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

tests/test_cli_workflows.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B/D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API