ClawAudit verdict
architecture-governance
Pure advisory skill providing architecture health scoring frameworks and governance templates; no network access, credential use, or code execution beyond local Python scripts for analysis.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Findings (1)
Possible hardcoded credential
references/metrics.md · code · token: "http://sonarqube/api/measures/component?component=my-service&metricKeys=
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.