Caveat verdict

article-factory-wechat

45
🟠 Risky
Significant risk patterns flagged — automated deep scan, not behavioral proof.

While the primary purpose seems to be producing WeChat articles, the use of package_install and execution sink raises some concerns.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

63
security
60
transparency
80
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (4)

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/humanize_cn.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match medium

Uses exec() — may execute shell commands

scripts/submit-draft.js · prose · downgraded · exec(

Pattern match medium

setuid — privilege escalation mechanism

scripts/temp-convert.js · prose · downgraded · setuid

Pattern match low

Accesses sensitive environment variables

scripts/submit-draft.js · prose · downgraded · process.env.WECHAT_APPSECRET

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API