Caveat verdict

better-readme

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill seems to be a legitimate tool for creating and improving README files, with no clear evidence of malicious behavior.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

68
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

Pipe to sh — executes piped content as shell commands

scripts/readme_audit.py · prose · downgraded · |sh

Pattern match medium

apt-get install — installs system packages

scripts/readme_audit.py · prose · downgraded · apt-get install

Pattern match low

pip3 install — installs Python packages at runtime

scripts/readme_audit.py · prose · downgraded · pip3 install

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class A/C). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API