Caveat verdict

book-library-scanner

45
🟠 Risky
Significant risk patterns flagged — automated deep scan, not behavioral proof.

The skill executes system commands and accesses file systems, which could be risky if not properly validated. However, there is no clear evidence of malicious intent.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

80
security
80
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match high

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

SKILL.md · code · subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

process_execdata_encoding

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API