Caveat verdict
capital-equipment
88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.
The skill seems to be used for finding, booking, and managing scientific research equipment, which does not seem to pose any security risks.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
100
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance
No red flags detected in static analysis.
Checked: 115 threat patterns · AST capability extraction · cross-zone compound shapes · permission integrity.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
network_in Was this verdict right?
Thanks — recorded.