Caveat verdict

code-analysis

code-analysis-skills

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Git history reflection tool with extensive built-in ethical guardrails requiring explicit consent flags and defaulting to self-scope only; executionSinkDetected is consistent with running git analysis commands locally, and the skill actively guards against misuse rather than enabling it.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

55
security
50
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

Pipe to python — executes piped content as Python code

references/metrics-guide.md · prose · downgraded · | Python

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

src/main.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match medium

os.system/popen — direct OS command execution

tests/test_scanner.py · prose · downgraded · os.system(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API