ClawAudit verdict

code-review-automation

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill installs packages, which could potentially be used for malicious purposes, but there is no clear evidence.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

43
security
90
transparency
90
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (5)

Pattern match high

Possible hardcoded credential

tests/test_security_scanner.py · prose · downgraded · api_key = "sk-1234567890abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

code_review/security_scanner.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.call(

Pattern match medium

os.system/popen — direct OS command execution

code_review/security_scanner.py · prose · downgraded · os.system(

Pattern match medium

subprocess with shell=True — command injection vector

tests/test_security_scanner.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.call(user_input, shell=True

Pattern match low

Python os.getenv — reads environment variable

code_review/claude_client.py · prose · downgraded · os.getenv(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API