Caveat verdict

code-review-inspector

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Local AI-assisted code review skill using git to analyze local changes; network_in capability is for receiving the diff, and no code or credentials are sent to external services.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

0
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Findings (7)

Pattern match critical

Recursive delete from root or home — destructive command

CODE_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md · code · rm -rf /

Pattern match critical

<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection

CODE_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md · code · <script>

Pattern match critical

Possible hardcoded credential

CODE_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md · code · API_KEY = 'YOUR_API_KEY_HERE

Pattern match high

os.system/popen — direct OS command execution

CODE_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md · code · os.system(

Pattern match high

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

CODE_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md · code · subprocess.run(

Pattern match high

Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness

CODE_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md · code · silently

Pattern match medium

Accesses sensitive environment variables

CODE_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md · code · process.env.API_KEY

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

Requires 1 system binary. (1 elevated: git).

network_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API