Caveat verdict

conversation-flow-monitor

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill appears to be a tool for monitoring and preventing conversation flow issues. It does not seem to have any malicious behavior.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

68
security
100
transparency
80
maintenance

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

examples.md ยท code ยท subprocess.run(

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action โ€” may act without user awareness

SKILL.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท silently

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library โ€” network access

scripts/error_handler.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท got

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API