Caveat verdict

design-system-patterns

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Documentation of CSS token hierarchies and React theme-switching patterns; network_in capability is consistent with fetching theme/token data for a design system, and no suspicious data exfiltration is present.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

70
security
80
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match critical

<script> tag in markdown โ€” potential code injection

SKILL.md ยท code ยท <script

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

network_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API