Caveat verdict

dingtalk-shanji

45
🟠 Risky
Significant risk patterns flagged — automated deep scan, not behavioral proof.

The fallback installation path uses `curl -fsSL ... | sh` and PowerShell `irm ... | iex` fetching from `github.com/DingTalk-Real-AI` (not the official DingTalk org), executing remote code during install; the npm path is preferred but the remote-script fallback is a meaningful risk.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

20
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Makes network requests but does not declare curl/wget in required binaries

network_out

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (2)

Pattern match critical

Pipe-to-shell pattern (curl | sh) — supply chain attack vector

SKILL.md · code · curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DingTalk-Real-AI/dingtalk-workspace

Pattern match critical

Pipe to sh — executes piped content as shell commands

SKILL.md · code · | sh

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class A/B/E). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_installnetwork_out

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API