Caveat verdict
document-pdf
88
๐ข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ automated capability review, not behavioral proof.
Offers example Python code for PDF operations; all behavior is legitimate and confined to local processing.
โ Flagged for review โ coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis โ not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
85
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance
Permission integrity
Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries
file_read
Installs packages at runtime โ transitive dependencies are not auditable
package_install
Findings (1)
Pattern match low
Popular HTTP library โ network access
scripts/fill_fillable_fields.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท got
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions โ minimal attack surface.
file_readpackage_install Is this flag fair?
Thanks โ recorded.