ClawAudit verdict

dual-thinking

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
Low risk โ€” reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

Dual-thinking seems to be a second-opinion consultation skill with escalation for skill engineering, no evidence of malicious behavior.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

88
security
90
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (2)

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action โ€” may act without user awareness

SKILL.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท silently

Pattern match low

References agent memory files

references/impact-data.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท MEMORY.md

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API