Caveat verdict

email-bridge

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Email management skill for Gmail/QQ/NetEase with real-time IMAP monitoring, smart categorization, and explicit prompt injection protection; the skill actively sanitizes email content before AI processing and warns against sharing authorization codes in chat.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

35
security
90
transparency
90
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (3)

Pattern match critical

Recursive delete from root or home — destructive command

SKILL.md · code · rm -rf ~

Pattern match high

<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection

SKILL.md · prose · downgraded · <script>

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

email_bridge/daemon.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API