Caveat verdict

github-installer-agent

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Security-first GitHub repo cloning with explicit safety checks including URL validation, shallow clone, and no auto-execute of pip or npm install; behavior matches stated purpose and explicitly avoids executing unknown code.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

38
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Makes network requests but does not declare curl/wget in required binaries

network_out

Installs packages at runtime โ€” transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

References sudo โ€” requests elevated privileges

README.md ยท code ยท sudo

Pattern match high

Recursive delete from root or home โ€” destructive command

scripts/test_security.sh ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท rm -rf /

Pattern match low

Sets world-executable permissions

scripts/test_security.sh ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท chmod 777

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

network_outpackage_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API