Caveat verdict
github-issue-reply-assistant
88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.
The skill generates reply drafts locally and optionally uses network calls for API access, but it does not exfiltrate data or run untrusted code.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
98
security
80
transparency
70
maintenance
Findings (1)
Pattern match low
Python os.getenv — reads environment variable
scripts/github_issue_reply_assistant.py · prose · downgraded · os.getenv(
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
network_in Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.