ClawAudit verdict

goodreads

goodreads-full

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

goodreads scores 64/100 (Caution). It requires 1 binaries. 2 high-severity flags.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

68
security
50
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (4)

Pattern match high

<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection

scripts/goodreads-rss.py · prose · downgraded · <script

Pattern match low

Python urllib.request — network access

scripts/goodreads-rss.py · prose · downgraded · urllib.request

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library — network access

scripts/goodreads-writer.py · prose · downgraded · got

Pattern match low

Python os.environ.get — reads environment variable

scripts/goodreads-writer.py · prose · downgraded · os.environ.get(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

Requires 1 system binary.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API