Caveat verdict

growth-engineer

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill appears to be a Growth Engineer for mobile apps and agent runtimes, correlating analytics and other signals into proposal drafts. It uses subprocess execution but for legitimate purposes, and there's no clear evidence of malicious behavior.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

95
security
80
transparency
80
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime โ€” transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

Requires 2 system binaries.

network_infile_writepackage_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API