ClawAudit verdict
grpc-test-automation
The skill's complex workflow uses network_in for legitimate gRPC testing purposes. There is no evidence of malicious behavior.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Findings (5)
Raw socket connection — low-level network access
references/serial-protocol.md · code · socket.connect(
Python shutil file operation — copies/moves/deletes files
references/serial-protocol.md · code · shutil.copytree(
subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python
scripts/generate_report.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.check_call(
Python directory traversal
references/serial-protocol.md · code · os.listdir(
pip3 install — installs Python packages at runtime
scripts/init_project.sh · prose · downgraded · pip3 install
Why the tier is capped
Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
network_in Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.