Caveat verdict

idea-coach

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill seems to provide a useful project management and GitHub integration service without any malicious intent.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

80
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Findings (2)

Pattern match medium

References sudo โ€” requests elevated privileges

README.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท sudo

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

scripts/coach.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API