ClawAudit verdict
test-driven-development
imbeasting-test-driven-development
88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose
The skill seems to be focused on test-driven development and does not pose any immediate risk.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
100
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance
No red flags detected in static analysis.
Checked: 115 threat patterns · AST capability extraction · cross-zone compound shapes · permission integrity.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
data_encoding Was this verdict right?
Thanks — recorded.