ClawAudit verdict

install-stack-flagos

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill installs packages inside a GPU container, which could potentially be used for malicious purposes, but the documentation seems legitimate.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

65
security
40
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries

file_read+write

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (3)

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/collect_env_info.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match medium

subprocess with shell=True — command injection vector

scripts/collect_env_info.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True

Pattern match low

importlib.import_module — dynamic module loading

scripts/validate_packages.py · prose · downgraded · importlib.import_module(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_installfile_write

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API