Caveat verdict
issue-request-manager
88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.
Issue lifecycle management skill with GitHub/GitLab/Jira integration; high-level documentation with no suspicious credential handling or exfiltration patterns.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
70
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance
Findings (1)
Pattern match critical
Possible hardcoded credential
NOTIFICATION_GUIDE.md · code · secret="your_secret
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.