ClawAudit verdict

ai-code-format-review

java-code-format-review

45
๐ŸŸ  Risky
Significant concerns โ€” only install if you understand the risks

The skill reviews AI-generated code for formatting consistency with a focus on Java conventions, but its use of network capabilities could potentially be risky if not properly validated.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

100
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

network_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API