ClawAudit verdict
lin-tet-master
Testing specialist guidance skill providing QA methodology; no capabilities flagged and no unusual behavior present in content.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Findings (5)
Possible hardcoded credential
references/e2e-testing.md · code · password: 'TestPass123!
<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection
references/security-testing.md · code · <script>
Dynamic import() — loads module at runtime
references/qa-methodology.md · code · import('
POSTs data to external URL
references/performance-testing.md · code · .post('http://
Popular HTTP library — network access
references/tdd-iron-laws.md · code · got
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.