Caveat verdict

linux-firewall-hardening

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Firewall hardening guide skill with documented rollback protection and emergency procedures; all described operations are legitimate security configuration tasks with no exfiltration or remote code execution patterns.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

8
security
80
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (6)

Pattern match high

References sudo — requests elevated privileges

SKILL.md · code · sudo

Pattern match high

Writes to SKILL.md — self-modifying skill

references/remaining-improvements.md · prose · downgraded · SKILL.md § State Persistence — agents must create `$STATE_DIR` and write

Pattern match high

Pipe to python — executes piped content as Python code

scripts/firewall-apply.sh · prose · downgraded · | python3

Pattern match high

Possible hardcoded credential

scripts/firewall-plan.sh · prose · downgraded · TOKEN="sha256:$(echo -n

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness

SKILL.md · prose · downgraded · silently

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library — network access

scripts/firewall-apply.sh · prose · downgraded · Got

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

network_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API