Caveat verdict

literature-daily-report

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Academic literature aggregation skill fetching from public APIs (PubMed, bioRxiv, arXiv) and generating summaries; credential_access is limited to an LLM key for summarization and all data flows are transparent.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

43
security
50
transparency
90
maintenance

Permission integrity

Code accesses API keys/tokens but declares no environment variables

credential_access

Findings (3)

Pattern match critical

Possible hardcoded credential

SKILL.md · code · API_KEY="your-api-key

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/literature_collector.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match low

Python os.environ.get — reads environment variable

scripts/literature_collector.py · prose · downgraded · os.environ.get(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B/D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

credential_access

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API