ClawAudit verdict
manuscript-math-docx-qc
88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose
The skill appears to be a benign and useful tool for manuscript quality control.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
100
security
90
transparency
70
maintenance
No red flags detected in static analysis.
Checked: 115 threat patterns · AST capability extraction · cross-zone compound shapes · permission integrity.
Why the tier is capped
Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Was this verdict right?
Thanks — recorded.