ClawAudit verdict

paper2poster

newpaper-skill

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill clones a GitHub repository, installs dependencies, and executes commands. While the intent seems legitimate, the use of dynamic_eval and package_install capabilities raises concerns about potential security risks.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

63
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

References sudo — requests elevated privileges

README.md · code · sudo

Pattern match medium

conda install — installs packages via conda

README.md · code · conda install

Pattern match low

References agent configuration files

README.md · prose · downgraded · agent_config

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

dynamic_evalpackage_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API