Caveat verdict
outline-revision-annotator
88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.
Document comparison skill generating annotated PDF diffs between outline versions; no credential access or network calls, behavior fully matches stated structural revision review purpose.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
70
security
90
transparency
70
maintenance
Findings (1)
Pattern match critical
Pipe to python — executes piped content as Python code
references/windows.md · code · | python
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.