ClawAudit verdict

overleaf-latex

🟢 Trusted

Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

Overleaf LaTeX project management via git integration with credentials in user-configured file; behavior matches stated purpose of managing LaTeX documents.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

security

transparency

maintenance

Permission integrity

Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries

file_read+write

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (4)

Pattern match high

References sudo — requests elevated privileges

SKILL.md · code · sudo

Pattern match high

apt-get install — installs system packages

SKILL.md · code · apt-get install

Pattern match high

Possible hardcoded credential

scripts/overleaf_health.py · prose · downgraded · PASSWORD=") for l in lines) or \ any(l.startswith(

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/overleaf_health.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

Requires 1 system binary.

file_writepackage_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API