Caveat verdict
paper-analyzer
The content describes a tool for analyzing academic papers, reading files, and executing external scripts. While it seems legitimate, it does involve file reading and process execution which could be risky if not used properly.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Findings (1)
subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python
SKILL.md · code · subprocess.run(
Why the tier is capped
Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
file_readprocess_exec Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.