ClawAudit verdict

paper-analyzer

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The content describes a tool for analyzing academic papers, reading files, and executing external scripts. While it seems legitimate, it does involve file reading and process execution which could be risky if not used properly.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

80
security
80
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match high

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

SKILL.md · code · subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

file_readprocess_exec

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API