ClawAudit verdict

paper-deep-reading-teaching-explainer

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
Low risk โ€” reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

The skill provides a detailed and transparent workflow for deep-reading research papers, generating authoritative reports, and creating teachable explanations without exfiltrating sensitive information or executing malicious code.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

80
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Findings (2)

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action โ€” may act without user awareness

SKILL.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท silently

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

scripts/init_paper_deep_reading_scaffold.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

network_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API