ClawAudit verdict
paper-generator
88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose
The content describes a tool for generating academic papers. It doesn't seem to have any malicious intent and appears to be a helpful tool for researchers.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
100
security
60
transparency
50
maintenance
No red flags detected in static analysis.
Checked: 115 threat patterns · AST capability extraction · cross-zone compound shapes · permission integrity.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Was this verdict right?
Thanks — recorded.