Caveat verdict

paper-research-agent

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill orchestrates multi-agent academic paper research including arxiv PDF downloads and parallel analysis; process_exec and file_read capabilities are used for the documented research pipeline with no evidence of exfiltration.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

80
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match high

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

SKILL.md ยท code ยท subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

process_execfile_read

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API