ClawAudit verdict

paper-revision-sop

88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

The content outlines a systematic process for revising academic papers based on reviewer comments. It seems like a legitimate and helpful tool.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

60
security
90
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (2)

Pattern match high

<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection

scripts/generate_enhanced_report.py · prose · downgraded · <script

Pattern match high

Uses eval() — can execute arbitrary code

scripts/generate_enhanced_report.py · prose · downgraded · eval(

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API