ClawAudit verdict

paper-analysis-evidence

paper-summary-json

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill analyzes academic papers and potentially extracts sensitive information.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

68
security
90
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

Long base64 string (100+ chars) — likely obfuscated payload

SKILL.md · frontmatter · title/task/background/problem/method/datasets/baselines/metrics/results/ablation

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/prepare_papers.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match low

Python urllib.request — network access

scripts/prepare_papers.py · prose · downgraded · urllib.request

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API