ClawAudit verdict

pdf-filler

88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

The skill appears to be a legitimate library for filling PDF AcroForm fields. It does not contain any malicious code or intent.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

85
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (1)

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness

references/FIELD_TYPES.md · prose · downgraded · silently

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API