ClawAudit verdict

pdf

pdf-nano

45
๐ŸŸ  Risky
Significant concerns โ€” only install if you understand the risks

The skill executes a shell command to run a Python script, which could potentially be used for malicious purposes.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

75
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries

file_read

Installs packages at runtime โ€” transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (2)

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

scripts/fill_pdf_form_with_annotations.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท subprocess.run(

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library โ€” network access

scripts/fill_fillable_fields.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท got

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

file_readpackage_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API