Caveat verdict

personal-genomics

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill appears to be a legitimate personal genomics tool with clear documentation and usage guidelines.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

80
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match high

<script> tag in markdown โ€” potential code injection

comprehensive_analysis.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท <script>

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API