ClawAudit verdict
intelligence-desk-brief
portfolio-risk-desk
The skill seems to be focused on generating portfolio-aware daily risk analysis briefs. It doesn't have explicitly risky capabilities.
โ Flagged for review โ coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis โ not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Findings (2)
subprocess execution โ runs system commands from Python
tests/test_cli_e2e.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท subprocess.run(
Python urllib.request โ network access
src/intelligence_desk_brief/apify_bootstrap.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท urllib.request
Why the tier is capped
Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions โ minimal attack surface.
Is this flag fair?
Thanks โ recorded.