ClawAudit verdict

Project Context Guide

project-context-guide

45
๐ŸŸ  Risky
Significant concerns โ€” only install if you understand the risks

The skill provides intelligent code analysis and Git history tracing, which requires network access. While this is not inherently malicious, it could pose a security risk if the analysis process is hijacked or if sensitive data is accessed.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

90
security
80
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

scripts/git_inspector.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

network_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API