ClawAudit verdict
project-narrator
The skill generates and maintains project documentation with no indication of malicious behavior or security risks.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Findings (4)
<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection
scripts/audit.py · prose · downgraded · <script>
Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness
references/examples.md · prose · downgraded · silently
subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python
scripts/generate.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(
Python urllib.request — network access
scripts/audit.py · prose · downgraded · urllib.request
Why the tier is capped
Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.